Home »
News & Insights »
China IPR News »
【Trademark】The judgments of the first instance and the second instance were different and who should be responsible for the loss of RMB 80,000 under the fraudulent QQ transaction?
【Trademark】The judgments of the first instance and the second instance were different and who should be responsible for the loss of RMB 80,000 under the fraudulent QQ transaction?