CONTENTS
PART ONE GENERAL PROVISIONS
CHAPTER I THE AIM, SCOPE OF APPLICATION AND BASIC PRINCIPLES
CHAPTER II JURISDICTION
SECTION 1 JURISDICTION BY LEVEL
SECTION 2 TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION
SECTION 3 REFERRAL AND DESIGNATION OF JURISDICTION
CHAPTER III TRIAL ORGANIZATION
CHAPTER IV WITHDRAWAL
CHAPTER V PARTICIPANTS IN PROCEEDINGS
SECTION 1 PARTIES
SECTION 2 AGENTS AD LITEM
CHAPTER VI EVIDENCE
CHAPTER VII TIME PERIODS AND SERVICE
SECTION 1 TIME PERIODS
SECTION 2 SERVICE
CHAPTER VIII CONCILIATION
CHAPTER IX PROPERTY PRESERVATION AND PRELIMINARY EXECUTION
CHAPTER X COMPULSORY MEASURES AGAINST IMPAIRMENT OF CIVIL ACTIONS
CHAPTER XI LITIGATION COSTS
PART TWO TRIAL PROCEDURE
CHAPTER XII ORDINARY PROCEDURE OF FIRST INSTANCE
SECTION 1 BRINGING A SUIT AND ACCEPTING A CASE
SECTION 2 PREPARATIONS FOR TRIAL
SECTION 3 TRIAL IN COURT
SECTION 4 SUSPENSION AND CONCLUSION OF A LAWSUIT
SECTION 5 JUDGMENT AND ORDER
CHAPTER XIII SUMMARY PROCEDURE
CHAPTER XIV PROCEDURE OF SECOND INSTANCE
CHAPTER XV SPECIAL PROCEDURE
SECTION 1 GENERAL STIPULATIONS
SECTION 2 CASES CONCERNING CREDENTIALS OF VOTERS
SECTION 3 CASES CONCERNING THE PROCLAMATION OF A PERSON AS MISSING OR DEAD
SECTION 4 CASES CONCERNING THE DETERMINATION OF A CITIZEN AS INCOMPETENT OR WITH LIMITED CAPACITY FOR CIVIL CONDUCT
SECTION 5 CASES CONCERNING THE DETERMINATION OF A PROPERTY AS OWNERLESS
CHAPTER XVI PROCEDURE FOR TRIAL SUPERVISION
CHAPTER XVII SUMMARY PROCEDURE FOR RECOVERING A DEBT
CHAPTER XVIII PROCEDURE FOR PUBLIC INVITATION TO ASSERT CLAIMS
CHAPTER XIX PROCEDURE FOR THE BANKRUPTCY REPAYMENT OF ENTERPRISES AS LEGAL PERSONS
PART THREE PROCEDURE OF EXECUTION
CHAPTER XX GENERAL STIPULATIONS
CHAPTER XXI APPLICATION FOR AND REFERRAL OF EXECUTION
CHAPTER XXII EXECUTION MEASURES
CHAPTER XXIII SUSPENSION AND CONCLUSION OF EXECUTION
PART FOUR SPECIAL STIPULATIONS FOR CIVIL PROCEDURES INVOLVING FOREIGN INTERESTS
CHAPTER XXIV GENERAL PRINCIPLES
CHAPTER XXV JURISDICTION
CHAPTER XXVI SERVICE AND TIME PERIODS
CHAPTER XXVII PROPERTY PRESERVATION
CHAPTER XXVIII ARBITRATION
CHAPTER XXIX JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE
PART ONE GENERAL PROVISIONS
CHAPTER I THE AIM, SCOPE OF REGULATION AND BASIS PRINCIPLES
Article 1. The Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China is formulated on the basis of the Constitution and in the light of the experience and actual conditions of our country in trying civil cases.
Article 2. The aim of the Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China is to protect the exercise of the litigation rights of the parties, ensure that the people’s courts ascertain facts, distinguish right from wrong, apply the law correctly, try civil cases promptly, affirm the rights and obligations in civil affairs, impose sanctions for civil wrongs, protect the lawful rights and interests of the parties, educate citizens to voluntarily abide by the law, maintain the social and economic order, and guarantee the smooth progress of the socialist construction.
Article 3. The provisions of this Law shall be applicable to civil lawsuits concerning disputes over the status of property and persons among citizens, legal persons or other organizations respectively and mutually between citizens, legal persons and other organizations.
Article 4. All those who engage in civil lawsuits within the territory of the People’s Republic of China must abide by this Law.
Article 5. Foreign nationals, stateless persons, foreign enterprises and organizations that institute or respond to prosecutions in the people’s courts shall have the same litigation rights and obligations as citizens, legal persons and other organizations of the People’s Republic of China.
Should the courts of a foreign country impose restrictions on the civil litigation rights of the citizens, legal persons and other organizations of the People’s Republic of China, the people’s courts of the People’s Republic of China shall follow the principle of reciprocity regarding the civil litigation rights of the citizens, enterprises and organizations of that foreign country.
Article 6. The people’s courts shall exercise the judicial authority with respect to civil cases.
The people’s courts shall try civil cases independently in accordance with the law, and shall not be subject to interference by an administrative organ, public organization or individual.
Article 7. In conducting civil proceedings, the people’s courts must base themselves on facts and take the law as the criterion.
Article 8. The parties to a civil lawsuit shall have equal litigation rights. The people’s courts shall, in conducting civil proceedings, guarantee and faciliate the exercise of litigation rights by the parties, and apply the law equally to the parties.
Article 9. In conducting civil proceedings, the people’s courts shall carry out conciliation in accordance with the principles of voluntariness and lawfulness; if conciliation efforts are ineffective, they shall render judgments without delay.
Article 10. In handing civil cases, the people’s courts shall, as provided for by law, apply the systems of collegial panel, withdrawal of judicial personnel, public trial, and the system whereby the second hearing is final.
Article 11. Citizens of all nationalities shall have the right to use their native spoken and written languages in civil proceedings.
Where people of a minority nationality live in a concentrated community or where a number of nationalities live together in one area, the people’s courts shall conduct hearings and issue legal documents in the spoken and written languages commonly used by the local nationalities.
The people’s courts shall provide translations for any participant in the court proceedings who is not familiar with the spoken or written languages commonly used by the local nationalities.
Article 12. In the trial of civil cases by the people’s court, the parties shall have the right to engage in argument.
Article 13. The parties to a civil lawsuit shall be entitled, within the scope stipulated by law, to dispose of their rights in civil affairs and their litigation rights.
Article 14. The people’s procuratorates shall have the right to exercise legal supervision over the civil proceedings.
Article 15. If the civil rights and interests of the state, a collective or an individual have been infringed, a state organ, public organization, enterprise or institution may support the injured unit or individual to initiate legal action in a people’s court.
Article 16. The people’s conciliation committees shall be mass organizations to conciliate civil disputes, which are to function under the guidance of the grass-roots people’s governments and the basic people’s courts.
A people’s conciliation committee shall conduct conciliation in accordance with legal provisions and the principle of voluntariness. The parties concerned shall execute the agreement reached in conciliation: those who refuse a conciliation or those for whom a conciliation has failed or those who have retracted from a conciliation agreement may initiate legal proceedings in a people’s court.
If a people’s conciliation committee violates the law in conciliating civil disputes, a people’s court shall make corrections.
Article 17. The people’s congresses of the national autonomous areas may formulate adoptive or supplementary provisions in accordance with the principles of the Constitution and this Law and with the specific circumstances of the local nationalities. Such provisions made by an autonomous region shall be submitted to the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress for approval. The provisions made by an autonomous prefecture or autonomous county shall be submitted to the standing committee of the people’s congress of the relevant autonomous region or province for approval and to the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress for the record.
CHAPTER II JURISDICTION
SECTION 1 JURISDICTION BY LEVEL
Article 18. The basic people’s courts shall have jurisdiction as courts of first instance over civil cases, unless otherwise stipulated in this Law.
Article 19. The intermediate people’s courts shall have jurisdiction as courts of first instance over the following civil cases:
(1) major cases involving foreign interests;
(2) cases that have major impact on the area under their jurisdiction; and
(3) cases under the jurisdiction of the intermediate people’s courts as determined by the Supreme People’s Court.
Article 20. The higher people’s courts shall have jurisdiction as courts of first instance over civil cases that have major impact on the areas under their jurisdiction.
Article 21. The Supreme People’s Court shall have jurisdiction as the court of first instance over the following civil cases:
(1) cases that have major impact on the whole country; and
(2) cases that the Supreme People’s Court deems it should try.
SECTION 2 TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION
Article 22. A civil lawsuit brought against a citizen shall be under the jurisdiction of the people’s court in the place where the defendant has his domicile; if the defendant’s domicile is different from his habitual residence, the lawsuit shall be under the jurisdiction of the people’s court in the place of his habitual residence.
A civil lawsuit brought by a serviceman against a civilian shall be under the jurisdiction of the people’s court in the place where the defendant has his domicile.
A civil lawsuit brought against a legal person or any other organization shall be under the jurisdiction of the people’s court in the place where the defendant has its domicile.
Where the domiciles or habitual residences of several defendants in the same lawsuit are in the areas under the jurisdiction of two or more people’s courts, all of those people’s courts shall have jurisdiction over the lawsuit.
Article 23. The civil lawsuits described below shall be under the jurisdiction of the people’s court in the place where the plaintiff has his domicile; if the plaintiff’s domicile is different from his habitual residence, the lawsuit shall be under the jurisdiction of the people’ court in the place of the plaintiff’s habitual residence. The relevant lawsuits are:
(1) those brought by civilians against servicemen;
(2) those concerning the status of persons not residing within the territory of the People’s Republic of China;
(3) those concerning the status of persons whose whereabouts have been unknown or who have been declared as missing.
(4) those against persons who are undergoing rehabilitation through labour; and
(5) those against persons who are undergoing imprisonment.
Article 24. A lawsuit initiated for a contract dispute shall be under the jurisdiction of the people’s court in the place where the defendant has his domicile or where the contract is performed.
Article 25. The parties to a contract may choose through agreement stipulated in the written contract the people’s court in the place where the defendant has his domicile, where the contract is performed, where the contract is signed, where the plaintiff has his domicile or where the object of the action is located to have jurisdiction over the case, provided that the provisions of this Law regarding jurisdiction by level and exclusive jurisdiction shall not be violated.
Article 26. A lawsuit initiated for an insurance contract dispute shall be under the jurisdiction of the people’s court in the place where the defendant has his domicile or where the insured object is located.
Article 27. A lawsuit initiated for a bill dispute shall be under the jurisdiction of the people’s court in the place where the bill is paid or where the defendant has his domicile.
Article 28. A lawsuit initiated for a dispute over railway, highway, water, or air transport or through transport contract shall be under the jurisdiction of the people’s court in the place where the transport started or ended or where the defendant has his domicile.
Article 29. A lawsuit initiated for an infringing act shall be under the jurisdiction of the people’s court in the place where the infringing act took place or where the defendant has his domicile.
Article 30. A lawsuit concerning claims for damages caused by a railway, highway, water or aviation accident shall be under the jurisdiction of the people’s court in the place where the accident took place or where the vehicle or ship first arrived after the accident or where the aircraft first landed after the accident, or where the dependent has his domicile.
Article 31. A lawsuit initiated for damages caused by a ship collision or any other maritime accident shall be under the jurisdiction of the people’s court in the place where the collision took place or where the collision ship first docked after the accident or where the ship at fault was detained, or where the defendant has his domicile.
Article 32. A lawsuit initiated for maritime salvage shall be under the jurisdiction of the people’s court in the place where the salvage took place or where the salvaged vessel first docked after the disaster.
Article 33. A lawsuit initiated for general average shall be under the jurisdiction of the people’s court in the place where the ship first docked after the general average took place or the adjustment thereof was conducted or where the voyage ended.
Article 34. The following cases shall be under the exclusive jurisdiction of the people’s courts herein specified:
(1) A lawsuit initiated for real estate shall be under the jurisdiction of the people’s court in the place where the estate is located;
(2) A lawsuit concerning harbour operations shall be under the jurisdiction of the people’s court in the place where the harbour is located; and
(3) A lawsuit concerning an inheritance shall be under the jurisdiction of the people’s court in the place where the decedent had his domicile upon his death, or where the principal part of his estate is located.
Article 35. When two or more people’s courts have jurisdiction over a lawsuit, the plaintiff may bring his lawsuit in one of these people’s courts; if the plaintiff brings the lawsuit in two or more people’s courts that have jurisdiction over the lawsuit, it shall be handled by the people’s courts that first files the case.
SECTION 3 REFERRAL AND DESIGNATION OF JURISDICTION
Article 36. If a people’s court discovers that a case it has accepted is not under its jurisdiction, it shall refer the case to the people’s court that does have jurisdiction over the case. The people’s court to which a case has been referred shall accept the case, and if it considers that, according to relevant regulations, the case referred is not under its jurisdiction, it shall report to a superior people’s court for the designation of jurisdiction and shall not independently refer it again to another people’s court.
Article 37. If a people’s court which has jurisdiction over a case is unable to exercise the jurisdiction for special reasons, a superior people’s court shall designate another court to exercise the jurisdiction.
In the event of a jurisdictional dispute between various people’s courts, it shall be resolved by the disputing parties through consultation; if the dispute cannot be resolved through consultation, it shall be reported to a people’s court superior to both disputing parties for the designation of jurisdiction.
Article 38. Should any party hold an objection to the jurisdiction of a case after its acceptance by a people’s court, the party shall raise the objection during the term for filing the bill of defence. The people’s court shall examine such objection. If the objection is tenable, the people’s court shall order that the case be transferred to the people’s court that does have jurisdiction over the case; if the objection is untenable, the people’s court shall order to turn it down.
Article 39. People’s courts at higher levels shall have the authority to try civil cases over which people’s courts at lower levels have jurisdiction as courts of first instance; they may also transfer civil cases over which they themselves have jurisdiction as courts of first instance to people’s courts at lower levels for trial.
If a people’s court at a lower level deems it necessary for a civil case of first instance under its jurisdiction to be tried by a people’s court at a higher level, it may request such a people’s court to try the case.
CHAPTER III TRIAL ORGANIZATION
Article 40. Civil cases of first instance shall be tried in a people’s court by a collegial panel consisting of both judges and assessors or of judges alone. The collegial panel must have an odd number of members.
Civil cases to which summary procedure is applied shall be tried by a single judge alone.
When carrying out their duties as assessors, the assessors shall have equal rights and obligations with the judges.
Article 41. Civil cases of second instance shall be tried in a people’s court by a collegial panel of judges. The collegial panel must have an odd number of members.
When retrying a case remanded by a people’s court of second instance, the people’s court of first instance shall form a new collegial panel in accordance with the procedure of first instance.
If a case for retrial was originally tried at first instance, a new collegial panel shall be formed according to the procedure of first instance; if the case was originally tried at second instance or was removed to a people’s court at a higher level for trial, a new collegial panel shall be formed according to the procedure of second instance.
Article 42. The president of the court or the chief judge of a division shall designate a judge to serve as the presiding judge of the collegial panel; if the president or the chief judge participates in trial, he himself shall serve as the presiding judge.
Article 43. When deliberating a case, a collegial panel shall observe the principle that the minority shall defer to the majority. The deliberations shall be recorded in writing, and the transcript shall be signed by the members of the collegial panel. Diverging opinions in the deliberations must be truthfully entered in the transcript.
Article 44. The judicial personnel shall handle the case impartially and in accordance with the law.
The judicial personnel shall not accept a treat or gift of the parties of their agents ad litem.
Any judicial personnel who commits embezzlement, accepts bribes, practices malpractice for personal benefits or perverts the law in making judgment shall be pursued for legal responsibility; if a crime is constituted, the offender shall be investigated for criminal responsibility according to law.
CHAPTER IV WITHDRAWAL
Article 45. A member of the judicial personnel in any of the following circumstances must withdraw, and the parties to the case shall also have the right to request, orally or in writing, that he withdraw.
The relevant circumstances are:
(1) he is a party or a near relative of a party to the case or a near relative of an agent ad litem in the case;
(2) he has a personal interest in the case; or
(3) he has some other relationship with a party to the case that could influence the impartial handling of the case.
The above provisions shall also apply to clerks, interpreters, expert witnesses and inspectors.
Article 46. When a party requests the withdrawal of a member of the judicial personnel, he shall explain the reason for this request and submit the request at the beginning of the proceedings; the request may also be submitted before the end of court debate if the reason for the withdrawal becomes known only after the beginning of the proceedings.
Pending a decision on withdrawal by the people’s court, personnel who has been requested to withdraw shall temporarily suspend his participation in the proceedings of the case, but with the exception of cases that require the adoption of emergency measures.
Article 47. The withdrawal of a court president who serves as the presiding judge shall be decided by the judicial committee; the withdrawal of judicial personnel shall be decided by the court president; the withdrawal of other personnel shall be decided by the presiding judge.
Article 48. The decision of a people’s court on a request for withdrawal shall be made orally or in writing within three days after the request was made. If a party is not satisfied with the decision, it may apply for reconsideration which could be granted only once. During the period of reconsideration, personnel who has been requested to withdraw shall not suspend his participation in the proceedings. The decision of a people’s court on an application for reconsideration shal